This allows us to focus our energy on making the latest Path Finder rock solid on the latest versions of macOS. The latest version will continue to get updates and the older versions will not unless a serious bug is found. We plan on releasing constant updates all year long, but we will have a paid upgrade once a year. So we have designed a ‘ best of both worlds‘ approach to selling Path Finder. I don’t want my credit card information stored on a remote server that could get hacked, and I don’t want to have to remember to cancel the subscription if I decide not to use the software in the future. One solution is to use a software subscription, but most people myself included, dislike the idea of a subscription. We no longer will hoard new features to be released in a later paid upgrade. The reasons for the change is to get new features out to users as soon as possible. And new releases sometimes had some minor issues the first few weeks after release. These large releases also took too much time to test and debug. We always ran into the problem of having features ready, but we had to wait until the next major update to get them into the hands of our users. We’ve realized that this release cycle isn’t the best for us, or our users. This upgrade cycle was much longer than what most companies use, but we usually found ourselves running way behind schedule, and we wanted to blow people away with a large number of new and exciting features. We have been releasing paid upgrades about once every 2-4 years and have released lots of free updates every few weeks. I recently cancelled my 1password subscription for the same reason (another great product that isn't great enough to justify the expense for me), and Evernote is getting dumped next (a once great product that crashed and burned with v10).Since 2000, Path Finder has been in continual development and we have released a steady flow of free and paid updates. Pathfinder is obviously going for the former. They can focus on a small niche of users that require their product and are willing to pay whatever, or they can focus on appealing to a larger user base and make up the subscription dollars in volume. These software developers are going to soon realize that there's only so many subscription dollars to go around. I'm actually fine with the subscription model most of the time, but only if the price is reasonable. I might just stick with Finder, which while still an embarrassing effort by Apple, has improved quite a bit over the years since I last used it regularly. I'll check out Forklift and Commander One again (I've tried both previously, but it's been years). A visit to their website to figure out what was going on with this was an insult to my intelligence. And their customer communication is horrible. But I'm just an average user with average needs, so I'm out.Īs others have said, they're poor at fixing bugs, and they keep adding more features that I don't need. If it was for professional use, or I did it all day as part of a hobby, it would be worth it. Even if it covered all my Macs, $30/year is pushing it. Now it would be US$60 annual subscription for file management. And in the old days, "major" upgrades were only once every 2-3 years. I have 4 macs for daily personal use, and subscription model only allows 2 macs per subscription, so I'd have to have 2 subscriptions (previous license was stingy at 3 activations, but 3 still better than 2 and I could add a 4th Mac for a small fee). I can re-install PF10 and use that until it no longer works on the latest macOS, but. Just accidentally updated PF without realizing it had switched to subscription model.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |